The Big Picture 4

Oh, yes, so it Appears … but to “who” does it appear eh ? ๐Ÿง

“Historically, we have looked to our religious leaders to understand the meaning of our lives; the nature of our world. With Galileo Galilei, this changed. In establishing that the Earth goes around the Sun, Galileo not only succeeded in believing the unbelievable himself, but also convinced almost everyone else to do the same. This was a stunning accomplishment in โ€˜physics outreachโ€™ and, with the subsequent work of Isaac Newton, physics joined religion in seeking to explain our place in the Universe. The more recent physics revolution of the past 80 years has yet to transform general public understanding in a similar way

From : https://www.nature.com/articles/436029a.pdf

“From the Big Bang to the Planck time 10^-43s later, physics fails us. Even general relativity breaks down for times earlier than the Planck time; no one knows how space-time and matter behaved during the Planck epoch”

From : Tai L. Chow’s book : Gravity, Black Holes, and the Very Early Universe – An Introduction to General Relativity and Cosmology

Yet the above is just the MATERIALIST view which ignores the Funda-Mental “role” of the Observer CONSCIOUSNESS inasmuch that without it space-time actually, I’d say, remains “static” and un-evolving eh ? Why ? Because, I’d suggest, without saying NOW, concepts such as Past, Present and Future (not to mention the so-called “Big Bang”) are totally irrelevant eh ? You see, in reality, Consciousness is Primary, the illusion of an individuated “self” comes from a Dynamic of thoughts and concepts being applied to (or overlaid upon or superimposed onto) a singular All-Inclusive-Quantum-Field … Thus what I’m suggesting IS that ALL phenomena are only “seen” because of YOUR Mind eh ? ๐Ÿ˜‰

Ah, “you” can’t designate a “Universe” in the absence of a Designating Consciousness eh ? ๐Ÿคฃโค๏ธ


[1] For the record : All the above is copied from my Facebook post (here).

4 thoughts on “The Big Picture

  1. Reply Simon May 11,2020 12:50 pm

    Ah, from an earlier incarnation (2014) of s1monlock.com โค๏ธ

    Some Humour

  2. Reply Simon May 12,2020 12:29 pm

    You often hear the teaching that all things are empty and devoid of self-entity, that there is no personal identity in the individual, and that all phenomena are devoid of any self-nature. Simply hearing this, or even intellectually understanding it, doesn’t make much of a difference. The only way to actualize it is by recognizing our nature, the self-existing wakefulness that is naturally empty. It’s by experiencing natural emptiness that we become free, not by imagining emptiness.

    From : As It Is (Vol 2)

  3. Reply Simon May 12,2020 5:29 pm

    Ah, I’d say it’s yet one more absolute gem from Tulku Urgyen eh ?

    You can ascertain the view, as it is, the moment duality has collapsed, when there is not even a hair-tip of fabricating. The true self-existing wakefulness does not mean that some external deity will drop into you. It is when YOUR own subtle thought patterns fall apart, dissolve, are destroyed. Any other state apart from that is a mind-made view.

    ๐Ÿ™ โค๏ธ ๐Ÿ˜‰

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

three × one =